SAP PI (Process Integration) is SAP’s on-premise middleware platform for connecting SAP and non-SAP systems via A2A, B2B, and B2C integration scenarios. SAP PO (Process Orchestration) is its direct successor, adding Business Process Management (BPM) and Business Rules Management (BRM) to the same integration engine on a unified Java stack. Both platforms share the same core architecture — the difference is that PO extends PI with full process orchestration and rule automation capabilities.
2027 deadline: SAP mainstream maintenance for PI/PO ends December 2027. Organizations running PI/PO should be actively planning migration to SAP Integration Suite. This guide covers everything you need to know: architecture, components, versions, how messages flow, adapters, monitoring, and the migration path.
Table of Contents
One of the most common points of confusion around this platform is the naming. SAP has used three different names across the product’s lifetime, and all three refer to the same integration middleware:
In practice, “SAP PI/PO” is used as a combined term across the industry because most active deployments use either PI 7.31 or PO 7.4/7.5, and they share the same core integration engine. When someone says “SAP PI” today, they usually mean the PI/PO platform in general.
SAP PI is an enterprise middleware platform built on SAP NetWeaver that enables seamless data exchange between SAP and non-SAP systems. It operates across three phases — design time, configuration time, and runtime — using a set of core components that together form the integration infrastructure.
SAP PO is the consolidated successor to SAP PI. Beyond data routing and transformation, PO enables end-to-end process automation where integration steps can be embedded within longer business workflows. PO adds two components to the PI stack:
Understanding how a message travels through SAP PI/PO helps both developers and architects design reliable integrations. Here is the standard flow for an asynchronous A2A message:
For synchronous scenarios (RFC, SOAP request/reply), the sender waits for a response; the pipeline returns the response message through the same channel within the timeout window.
ABAP Proxy is one of SAP PI/PO’s most powerful — and most SAP-specific — integration mechanisms. Rather than using an external adapter to connect SAP ERP to PI/PO, ABAP Proxy generates native ABAP classes directly from interface definitions in the ESR. The generated proxy class handles all serialization, XML conversion, and communication with the PI/PO Integration Server automatically.
This means an ABAP developer calls the generated proxy class in their program exactly like a local function module — without writing any network or XML code. PI/PO picks up the call, applies the configured routing and mapping, and delivers to the target system. ABAP Proxy is faster and more reliable than adapter-based SAP-to-PI communication, and it is the recommended pattern for any integration between an ABAP-based SAP system and PI/PO.
On the PI/PO side, ABAP Proxy uses a dedicated communication channel (the ABAP Proxy sender channel), which requires no adapter configuration — the communication is internal to the SAP NetWeaver stack.
Third-party adapter providers (including MIP) extend the standard library with additional connectors for cloud platforms, banking APIs, and marketplace integrations.
With SAP PI/PO reaching end of mainstream maintenance in December 2027, the strategic successor is SAP Integration Suite — a cloud-native integration platform on SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP).
For organizations planning the transition, our SAP PI/PO to Integration Suite migration guide covers the full assessment and phased approach.
Operational monitoring in SAP PI/PO uses two primary tools. The Message Monitor (transaction SXMB_MONI or the PI monitoring UI) shows every processed message — sender, receiver, status (success, error, in-queue), and the full payload at each pipeline step including pre-mapping, post-mapping, and delivery. The Runtime Workbench (RWB) provides a higher-level view: component health, adapter channel status, and system resource utilization. Automated alerting via the Component-Based Message Alert Framework (CBMA) notifies administrators of failures without manual polling.
MDP Group provides 24/7 SAP PI/PO monitoring services for organizations that need continuous integration oversight without dedicated in-house PI/PO specialists on call.
Despite the 2027 deadline, many enterprises continue operating PI/PO because migrations of complex integration landscapes take years, not months. Organizations with 200+ active interfaces, custom Java mappings, and ABAP proxy-based scenarios face significant re-engineering effort. On-premise PI/PO also meets data residency requirements that cloud deployments complicate for regulated industries. A phased migration — new interfaces on Integration Suite while existing PI/PO interfaces are gradually moved — is the standard approach MDP Group recommends.
All three names refer to the same SAP integration middleware at different points in its evolution. SAP XI (Exchange Infrastructure) was the original name from 2002. It was renamed SAP PI (Process Integration) from version 7.1 onwards. SAP PO (Process Orchestration) is the final on-premise version, released in 2012, which added BPM and BRM capabilities to the PI integration engine on a single Java stack.
SAP PI is the integration-only platform; SAP PO extends it with full BPMN 2.0 Business Process Management and Business Rules Management. PO runs on a single Java stack while PI required dual-stack (ABAP+Java) in older versions. Every PO system includes all PI capabilities plus orchestration — there is no functionality in PI that PO does not also have.
SAP PI/PO mainstream maintenance ends December 31, 2027. After this date, SAP will no longer release support packages, security patches, or legal change updates under standard contracts. Extended maintenance (at additional cost) is available until 2030. SAP’s strategic path forward is migration to SAP Integration Suite.
SAP Integration Suite — specifically its Cloud Integration (formerly SAP CPI) component — is the strategic replacement for PI/PO’s message integration capabilities. Integration Suite also includes API Management, Event Mesh, and Data Integration, making it a broader platform than PI/PO alone.
ABAP Proxy is a code generation mechanism that creates native ABAP classes from PI/PO interface definitions. These classes allow ABAP programs to call PI/PO integrations like local function modules, without writing XML or network code. It is the recommended integration pattern for communication between ABAP-based SAP systems and PI/PO because it is faster and more reliable than adapter-based alternatives.
Organizations with 50–100 interfaces typically plan 12–18 months. Those with several hundred interfaces, custom Java mappings, and complex ABAP proxy scenarios may plan 2–3 year migration programs. SAP’s Migration Toolkit accelerates standard scenarios; complex scenarios require manual re-engineering. A phased approach — moving new interfaces first while existing PI/PO interfaces follow in waves — is the lowest-risk migration pattern.
SAP Integration Team Lead Hasan Fatih Ekşioğlu is an integration expert in SAP PI/PO/CPI. As the Integration Team Leader at MDP Group, he leads projects focused on the integration of SAP, non-SAP, and third-party systems.
What is SAP MII Energy Monitoring and Analysis?
One of the biggest costs of a product is the cost of energy spent in the production phase. Businesses look for ways to manage their costs in the most...
How Strategy-First AI Is Shaping the Future of Procurement Negotiation?
The Art of Negotiation with AI Moving beyond automated emails toward strategy-first, policy-bound procurement intelligence. In...
If Human Knowledge Is the Limit, What Lies Beyond for AI?
In November 1971, ARPA set an ambitious goal: a speech understanding system with a vocabulary of 1,000 words and 90% accuracy. By 1976, a system...
B2B CRM&SRM Portal Solutions for SAP Users
Technology has brought the business sector to a completely different point. Businesses have been making technology investments in their digital...
SAP EWM vs SAP WM: Key Differences and Migration Guide
The difference between SAP EWM and SAP WM is a critical question for any organization planning an SAP S/4HANA migration. SAP introduced its WM...
e-Archive Invoice Turkey: Guideline and SAP Integration
What is the e-Archive? The invoice, which is the document of commercial transactions, has been included in the e-transformation process for a...
What Is Olmo 3? A Deep Dive into the Fully Open-Source LLM
Is Olmo 3 Truly Fully Open Source? In the fast-moving, hype-filled world of Large Language Models (LLMs), the term "Open Source" has faced a severe...
Salesforce Commerce Cloud WebDAV
In today’s world, retailers need to engage customers across multiple channels and devices. Salesforce Commerce Cloud gives retailers the ability to...
ABAP Clean Code: The Key to Better Software Development
Clean code refers to software that is readable, understandable, maintainable, and testable. Embracing clean code principles in ABAP ensures that...
Your mail has been sent successfully. You will be contacted as soon as possible.
Your message could not be delivered! Please try again later.